BHL
Archive
This is a read-only archive of the BHL Staff Wiki as it appeared on Sept 21, 2018. This archive is searchable using the search box on the left, but the search may be limited in the results it can provide.

Use Cases for items needing multiple MARC records

What are the scenarios where 1 item requires the association of multiple titles, i.e. MARC records?

Table of Contents

What do users want?
Scenarios
What about analytics?
Bound-withs
Monographic series
Serials w/ "seps"
Messy one:

What do users want?

What are the various ways in which users discover content re: something like Fieldiana?
  1. User knows the monographic title and searches on that
    • Ideally, the user should already know that what they want is part of Fieldiana b/c their citation SHOULD say so, but we all know...
    • The user may discover that their monograph is part of Fieldiana through a series statement or note -- is it enough to simply make this a clickable option that takes them to the MARC record for the serial?
      • - dukeg1 dukeg1The only problem this poses in relation to primary and secondary titles is, if we have the monographic record as the secondary title, and the user only has the monographic title but doesn't know to click "show secondary titles" in advanced search, they will never discover the entry for the monograph in the portal in the first place to be able to click on a series statement. If we make the monographs the primary titles, but another user enters the portal and wants to search "fieldiana," nothing will come up unless the click the "show secondary titles" option in the advanced search screen is clicked...
  2. User knows that what they want is part of Fieldiana, but doesn't know the exact vol. or monograph title
  3. User wants to browse within the Fieldiana series for something related to their area of interest

The serial record should display all the volumes/monographs within the run -- how does this look then? We discussed this briefly in the BHL Staff meeting and said we needed a Notes field to accommodate this. In this case it would look like:

Fieldiana Geology

[Note: the user only sees the note if they click on "show details for volume"]

Scenarios

What about analytics?

Are they related to this issue?- lipscombb lipscombb Dec 3, 2009
OCLC's page on Special Cataloging Guidelines http://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/specialcataloging/default.shtm#CHDBIIAF
OSUL description of analytics vs. non-analytics with a nice chart at the bottom of the page http://library.osu.edu/sites/cataloging/catanala.php
- ConnieR ConnieR Dec 3, 2009My digitally immigrated self had this momentary lapse. Analytics? What do Google analytics have to do with MARC records and associated multiple titles. Oops. Then I remembered....

Bound-withs

- lipscombb lipscombb Dec 2, 2009 I understand that bound-withs should be provided in the portal as separate intellectual units with their own barcodes and MARC records but for those bound-withs that are not treated in this way, we need to address the lacking MARC record via portal editing.

Monographic series




Serials w/ "seps"

Serials that have separate volumes cataloged as "seps"
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/15727
Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries
- lipscombb lipscombb Dec 3, 2009 How is this different than a monographic series? Is it that the "seps" don't include a series statement? Regardless of how they're cataloged, shouldn't users be able to come across the "seps" and know that they're also part of a serial?


Messy one:

Biologia Centrali-Americana
is for the entire set: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/730
but each section can have a separate marc record to identify it: a marc record for the aves volumes, one for the botany volumes, etc. - they have separate authors etc and have stand alone marc records and are cited in various ways. For example:
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm02203389
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dOCLCQ$dSMI$dUtOrBLW
043 $an-mx---$anc-----
049 $aSNI1$nosds 10/29/2004; recat/transf. of qQK215.H45 v.1-5 BOT J.D.S. (former bc's: 39088008149809; ...9817; ...9825; ...9833; ...9841)
050 0 $aQK215$b.H45
090 $aQH11$b.B615 v. 53-57
100 1 $aHemsley, W. Botting$q(William Botting),$d1843-1924.
240 1 0 $aBiologia Centrali-Americana.$n[53-57],$pBotany
245 1 0 $aBiologia Centrali-Americana, or, Contributions to the knowledge of the fauna and flora of Mexico and Central America.$n[53-57] /$ced. by F. Ducane Godman and Osbert Salvin. Botany / by W. Botting Hemsley, and A commentary on the introduction and appendix, by J.D. Hooker.

- drielinger drielinger Dec 2, 2009MBLWHOI has monograph records for the whole Biologia Centrali-Americana - we catalog as monographs